¡‰ïˆõ”Ô†F103-ft418
¡ƒjƒbƒNƒl[ƒ€F‚Ý‚¨‚è
¡”N—îF32ÎE1974E4E6
¡ŒŒ‰tFAŒ^
¡g’·F165cm
¡ƒXƒ^ƒCƒ‹F×g
¡ƒLƒƒƒ‰FŠÃ‚¦‚ñ–V
¡E‹ÆFOLc’Z‘呲
¡–Ú“IF—öl
¡ŽðF‚©‚È‚èˆù‚Þ
¡Œ‹¥F–¢¥
¡o‰ï‚¢ŒnFŒoŒ±‚È‚µ
¡Žï–¡FŽdŽ–Aƒhƒ‰ƒCƒuAƒVƒ‡ƒbƒsƒ“ƒO
š‚È‚ñ‚ƂȂ‹C‚ɂȂÁ‚½‚̂Ń[ƒ‹‚µ‚Ü‚µ‚½B
‰º‚̃AƒhƒŒƒX‚ÉŽ„‚̎ʃ‚ðÚ‚¹‚Ü‚µ‚½‚Ì‚ÅA
‹C‚É“ü‚Á‚Ä‚‚ꂽ‚çƒ[ƒ‹‚‚¾‚³‚¢‚Ë(o^0^o)/
««««««««««««««««««
http://manley.paiopai.com/a25/
Spam detection software, running on the system "lsd.chicago.il.us", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
The administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: ¡‰ïˆõ”Ô†F103-ft418 ¡ƒjƒbƒNƒl[ƒ€F‚Ý‚¨‚è
¡”N—îF32ÎE1974E4E6 ¡ŒŒ‰tFAŒ^ ¡g’·F165cm ¡ƒXƒ^ƒCƒ‹F×g
¡ƒLƒƒƒ‰FŠÃ‚¦‚ñ–V ¡E‹ÆFOLc’Z‘呲 ¡–Ú“IF—öl ¡ŽðF‚©‚È‚èˆù‚Þ
¡Œ‹¥F–¢¥ ¡o‰ï‚¢ŒnFŒoŒ±‚È‚µ ¡Žï–¡FŽdŽ–Aƒhƒ‰ƒCƒuAƒVƒ‡ƒbƒsƒ“ƒO
[...]
Content analysis details: (23.5 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
4.2 MIME_BOUND_DD_DIGITS Spam tool pattern in MIME boundary
4.1 X_MESSAGE_INFO Bulk email fingerprint (X-Message-Info) found
3.7 RCVD_HELO_IP_MISMATCH Received: HELO and IP do not match, but should
1.7 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains an IP address used for HELO
3.5 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100%
[score: 1.0000]
2.7 MIME_BASE64_TEXT RAW: Message text disguised using base64 encoding
3.7 MSGID_DOLLARS_RANDOM MSGID_DOLLARS_RANDOM
0.0 UPPERCASE_25_50 message body is 25-50% uppercase
Received on Sun Nov 19 02:43:11 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Nov 19 2006 - 07:01:04 EST