But FR does affect cwnd, so if one is doing CMT considering cwnd then
the traffic will be weighted towards the other destinations.
--brian
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005, Randall Stewart wrote:
> Janardhan Iyengar wrote:
> > Hi David,
> >
> >
> >>>Well, we tested it with a real failure. To be honest, I have not looked
> >>>at that code in a long time. So maybe my follow-up comment was wrong.
> >>>I have to look into it.
> >>
> >>OK. As a clarification... FR only causes faster retransmission, but should
> >>not cause the error count to increase nor the RTO to be adjusted...
> >>Correct?
> >
> >
> > I think that is correct. Only an RTO increases the error count.
> Or a missed heartbeat..
>
> But FR's do not effect the error count or RTO
>
> R
> >
> > regards,
> > jana
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------
> > Janardhan R. Iyengar http://www.cis.udel.edu/~iyengar
> > Protocol Engineering Lab -- CIS -- University Of Delaware
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------
> >
>
>
> --
> Randall Stewart
> ITD
> 803-345-0369 <or> 815-342-5222
-- Brian F. G. Bidulock ¦ The reasonable man adapts himself to the ¦ bidulock@openss7.org ¦ world; the unreasonable one persists in ¦ http://www.openss7.org/ ¦ trying to adapt the world to himself. ¦ ¦ Therefore all progress depends on the ¦ ¦ unreasonable man. -- George Bernard Shaw ¦Received on Mon Feb 14 16:05:32 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Mar 13 2006 - 15:22:24 EST